A fan's guide · NHL injury study
When a star is out injured, his linemates allow the other team more quality scoring chances. On offense, Sidney Crosby stands out: without him, his linemates create far fewer chances of their own.
The short answer
Every result controls for home ice, opponent strength, where shifts start, lineup strength and roster changes, and compares each linemate only with himself in the same season.
Defense · all six stars
4fewer chances against
Controlling for these, the star being in the lineup is associated with a 0.18 drop in his linemates' expected goals against per 60 minutes.1 That's about 4 fewer goals' worth of opponent chances per linemate over a season.
Clear evidenceOffense · Crosby
14more chances created
Controlling for these, Crosby being in the lineup is associated with a 0.66 increase in his linemates' expected goals for per 60 minutes.2 That's about 14 more goals' worth of chances per linemate over a season.
Clear evidenceDefense · Kaprizov
10fewer chances against
Controlling for these, Kaprizov being in the lineup is associated with a 0.44 drop in his linemates' expected goals against per 60 minutes.3 That's about 10 fewer goals' worth of opponent chances per linemate over a season.
Clear evidenceFor most of the stars individually, the data can't say much either way. Taken together, the clearest pattern is defensive: linemates keep the other team's chances down when the star plays. Offense improves too, but mostly because of Crosby. All numbers are 5-on-5; "per 60 minutes" means per 60 minutes of the linemate's own ice time.
How we tested it
A coach would never bench his best player for 20 games just to see what happens. Injuries do it for us. When a star is hurt, his regular linemates keep playing with the same team, in the same season, just without him. So we compared how those same linemates played in games with the star and in games without him.
One linemate's season (illustration)
We studied six stars who missed long stretches: 434 games in total without them, with dozens of their regular linemates.
A team without its star is different in other ways too, so before comparing we accounted for:
The stats, in plain words
Not every shot is equal. A one-timer from the slot is far more dangerous than a wrister from the blue line. Expected goals adds up the quality of every shot, measured in goals. "4 goals' worth of chances" means chances that would usually turn into about 4 goals.
Chances created: more is better
Chances against: fewer is better
Every shot attempt for and against while a player is on the ice. The share his team gets (often called Corsi) is a simple measure of who has the puck more.
Share of attempts: higher is better
The last pass before a goal. We checked whether linemates set up more goals with the star around. Nothing clear showed up, so it isn't charted here.
More is better
All numbers are from even-strength play (5-on-5), so power plays and penalty kills don't skew them. Every number is for one linemate over a full 82-game season of playing with the star.
Player by player
Goals' worth of the other team's chances each linemate avoids per season with the star. Bars to the right are good.
Extra goals' worth of chances each linemate's shifts create per season with the star. Bars to the right are good.
Hatched bars can look big, but they mean the data can't separate an effect from luck. Quinn Hughes missed only 14 games, for example, which is too few to judge.
The stories
The standout. Concussions cost Crosby most of two seasons, and his linemates' offense fell off without him. It's the strongest result in the study, though its size depends on how the roster changes are handled.2
Offense: clear evidenceA defensive surprise from an offensive star. With Kaprizov, his linemates allowed far fewer chances, and their share of shot attempts rose from about 46% to 52%.
Defense: clear evidenceKnown for his defensive game, and the data leans that way: about 6 fewer goals' worth of opponent chances per linemate per season. Not every season agreed, so it's a hint rather than proof.
Defense: a hintHis linemates did a little better on both ends with him, but not by enough to rule out luck.
Can't tellOnly 30 games without him to compare, and nothing clear in either direction.
Can't tellJust 14 games missed, the fewest of the six. That isn't enough to judge, so his numbers bounce around.
Can't tellBeing honest about it
Coming next · preliminary
A follow-up study looks at trades instead of injuries. Early hint: after Vegas acquired Jack Eichel in 2021, the team allowed noticeably fewer chances before he had played a single game, while he was still recovering from neck surgery. No other team had a defensive improvement that big at the same point in its season. It's one trade, so treat it as a hint, not a finding.
NHL natural experiment · injury absences · 5v5
When a star gets hurt, his linemates keep playing without him. Comparing the same linemates, in the same season, with and without the star turns "he makes everyone around him better" from a broadcast line into something you can measure.
The short answer
Controlling for home ice, opponent quality, zone starts, lineup strength and roster moves, the star being in the lineup is associated with his linemates allowing fewer expected goals against and taking more of the shot attempts. Extra offense shows up clearly for one player. Each figure is the coefficient on the star dressing, in the linemate's own 5-on-5 rate.
How it works
One real season: Vegas in 2023-24. Mark Stone played the first 56 games, then missed the last 26 with a lacerated spleen. His regular linemates played in both stretches, so each one is compared with himself.
Other roster moves happen in the middle of a comparison like this. Vegas traded for defenseman Noah Hanifin at game 62, while Stone was out. The model adjusts for that, so the difference is Stone's and not the trade's.
Player by player
Each bar is a 95% confidence interval: the range the true effect plausibly falls in. A bar that crosses the center line means the data can't rule out no effect.
Standouts
Case study
One season at a time the samples get small, and trades in the middle of an injury leave few clean games to compare. Rely on the five-season total. The one season that points the other way, 2023-24, is also the one with the least clean data.
What's being measured
A count of shot attempts: on goal, missed or blocked. Corsi % is the share of all attempts taken by a player's team while he's on the ice. Above 50% means his side had the puck more. Recorded by the NHL's official scorers.
Expected goals for and against. A model trained on hundreds of thousands of past shots gives each shot a chance of scoring from its distance, angle, type, and whether it was a rebound or off the rush. Adding those up per 60 minutes measures chance quality without the luck of who happened to score.
The pass right before a goal, per 60 minutes. It's the one measure that relies on a scorer's judgment call, so it carries the least weight here.
None of these come from betting odds or sportsbook lines. Each one is built from play-by-play events and doesn't know who the players are, so a player's reputation can't lift his linemates' numbers.
Read before quoting